The modification of the meta-language of normal forms of knowledge
Abstract
The set of the relations of normal forms of knowledge (alternative, concatenation, negation and iteration) is expanded by the two new relations: commitment relation – non-zero number of repetitions of some structure, non-commitment relation of some structure and structure brackets. The introduction of new relations is implemented by describing their structures with the basic relations of the meta-language of normal forms of knowledge. The text and graphical descriptions of the meta-language of normal forms of knowledge are presented, extended by the stylistic relations of the information structure descriptions. The examples of graphical variants of representing the structures of new relations between terms, which are used to self-describe the modified meta-language of normal forms of knowledge are presented with the minimally required comments.
Problems in programming 2019; 3: 03-10
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Русский)References
Norman, Donald A. (1985). LEARNING AND MEMORY. W. H. Freeman and Company San Francisco.
Osuga, S. (1989) Treatment of knowledge. Мир, Moskow (in Russian).
Brooks Frederick P .Jr. The Mythical
Man-Month. https://is.muni.cz/www/jirqa/The.Mythical.Man.Month.F.Brooks.pdf
Popper, K.: Evolutionary Epistemology. Evolutionary Theory: Paths into the Future. Ed. by J. W. Pollard. Ch. 10, pp. 239-255. Wiley, Chichester and New York (2002)
SoftCraft various programming: Bases of development of translators. http://sl-ur.narod2.ru /studentu/vtoroi_semestr_2010_g/pyavu/Osnovy_razrabotki_translyatorov_.rar
International Standard ISO/IEC 14977: 1996(E). Retrieved from http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-14977.pdf
Kurgaev A., Grygoryev S. Utility model patent UA 92484 U, 2014, Bulletin No 16 (in Ukrainian).
Kurgaev, A. & Grygoryev, S. (2015). The normal forms of knowledge. Dopov. nac. akad. nauk Ukr. No. 11. Р. 36-43 (in Russian). CrossRef
Kurgaev, A., Grygoryev, S. (2016). Metalanguage of Normal Forms of Knowledge. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis. 52(6), 839-848. CrossRef
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/pp2019.03.003
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.